Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 12 Halaman 205 206, Kurikulum Merdeka: Dr. Peter Langdon

TRIBUNJATENG.COM- Berikut kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris kelas 12 SMA halaman 205 206.

Artikel ini akan memudahkanmu dalam mengerjakan soal-soal Bahasa Inggris.

Mengerjakan soal Bahasa Inggris SMA tak sulit lagi dengan ulasan ini.

Berikut kunci jawaban yang berhasil dirangkum TribunBali.com dari berbagai sumber.

Pada bagian ini, membahas tentang materi yang terdapat pada halaman 205 206.

Simak kunci jawaban selengkapnya di sini.

Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 12 Halaman 205 206.

Soal Halaman 205 206

1. Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? Type Yes or No for each argument.

2. Thinking about the arguments presented by the six sources from the text above, which source do you agree with most strongly?

Source’s name: Dr. Peter Langdon

Using your own words, explain your choice by referring to your own opinion and the arguments presented by the source.

3. Based on the text of agreement and disagreement, are the statements in the table below facts or opinions?

Put a checklist in the Fact or Opinion for each statement.

Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 12 Halaman 205 205

1. a. "As you observe the jagged and woefully insufficient bursts of electricity from solar and wind, keep in mind that some reliable source of energy is required to do the heavy lifting."

Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? Yes

b. Ocean energy has the potential to contribute in the future.

Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? Yes

c. With all of these solutions, we can ensure the necessary renewable energy future.

Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? Yes

d. Clean energy sources can be used to generate electricity, process heat, fuel, and valuable chemicals while minimizing environmental impact.

Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? No

e. We simply need smart grids to connect everything and effectively "keep the lights on."

Could the following arguments represent Greenpeace’s disagreement? No

2. We as human beings who have minds should be able to protect the earth, and not destroy it.

However, so far we have only exploited natural resources without ever thinking about the consequences and trying to repair the damage.

For example, we have massively exploited non-renewable natural resources, namely oil, natural gas and coal.

3. a. People working on renewable energy technologies typically make enthusiastic claims regarding the potential of their specific technologies.

Is the argument a fact or an opinion? Opinion

b. Intelligent technologies can track and manage energy use patterns, provide flexible power that follows demand through the day, use better storage options and group producers together to form virtual power plants.

Is the argument a fact or an opinion? Fact

c. The reserve is that proportion of a mineral resource which has been discovered, quantified and is viable to exploit in current conditions.

Is the argument a fact or an opinion? Opinion

e. There is a strong case that this assumption is seriously mistaken.

Is the argument a fact or an opinion? Opinion

d.  However, little attention has been given to exploring the limits to renewable energy.

Is the argument a fact or an opinion? Fact

Disclaimer

- Jawaban di atas hanya digunakan oleh orangtua untuk memandu proses belajar anak.

- Soal ini berupa pertanyaan terbuka yang artinya ada beberapa jawaban tidak terpaku seperti di atas.

Artikel ini telah tayang di Tribun-Bali.